twc/ludus
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 32 Pull Requests Packages Projects 8 Releases Wiki Activity

Reindent things; start work on named fns; decide to refactor things

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Scott Richmond 2022-03-20 17:37:44 -04:00
parent 0f64307ba8
commit 5da8090d2b
1 changed files with 40 additions and 17 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

37
src/ludus/parser.clj
View File

@ -273,7 +273,8 @@
]
(let [curr (current parser)]
(case (token-type parser)
::token/rbrace (let [es (add-member exprs current_expr)]
::token/rbrace
(let [es (add-member exprs current_expr)]
(if (empty? es)
(advance (panic parser "Blocks must have at least one expression"))
(assoc (advance parser) ::ast {
@ -306,7 +307,8 @@
current_expr nil
]
(case (token-type parser)
::token/eof (let [es (add-member exprs current_expr)]
::token/eof
(let [es (add-member exprs current_expr)]
(if (empty? es)
(panic parser "Scripts must have at least one expression")
(assoc parser ::ast {::ast/type ::ast/script :exprs es})))
@ -341,10 +343,9 @@
(let [parsed (parse-tuple parser)]
(recur parsed (conj terms (::ast parsed))))
(-> parser
(assoc ::ast {::ast/type ::ast/synthetic :terms terms})
(assoc parser ::ast {::ast/type ::ast/synthetic :terms terms})
)))))
))))
(defn- parse-word [parser]
(let [curr (current parser)]
@ -509,14 +510,26 @@
(if (:success arrow)
(let [body (parse-expr (:parser arrow))]
(assoc body ::ast {::ast/type ::ast/fn
:name "anonymous"
:clauses [{::ast/type ::ast/clause
:pattern (::ast pattern)
:body (::ast body)}]}))
()
(panic pattern "Expected arrow after pattern in fn clause")
)
)
::token/word ()
;; TODO: finish this
;; right now it's broke
::token/word
(let [name (parse-word first)
pattern (parse-tuple-pattern name)
arrow (expect* ::token/rarrow "Expected arrow after pattern" name)
body (parse-expr (:parser arrow))
]
(
)
)
(panic parser "Expected name or clause after fn")
)))
@ -637,6 +650,16 @@
* Placeholders
* How much in parser, how much in analysis?
Some architectural changes:
* UGH, this code is just kind of a mess and hard to reason about
* Especially sequential forms
* Parsers are hard
* One idea:
* Refactor everything so that it returns a success or failure
* Because this is all stateless, in sequential forms, you can just do all the things
* This lets you do one let (with everything building up) and then a cond with bespoke errors/panics
* This also still lets you encapsulate parsererrors with poisoned nodes
")