Repeat might not have to take a block #10

New Issue

scott · 2023-12-14T05:09:02Z

kredati commented

2023-12-14 05:09:02 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

At current, repeat always takes a block after its times expression (a number or a word, nothing else). I thought that was necessary for parsing.

But you could have repeat {word|number} {expression}.

This could lead to light duty weirdness like repeat 4 forward! (100), but that's pretty readable, after all.

To reconsider.

At current, `repeat` always takes a block after its times expression (a number or a word, nothing else). I thought that was necessary for parsing. But you could have `repeat {word|number} {expression}`. This could lead to light duty weirdness like `repeat 4 forward! (100)`, but that's pretty readable, after all. To reconsider.

scott self-assigned this 2023-12-15 21:25:22 +00:00

scott added

now

and removed

scott commented

2023-12-24 19:17:46 +00:00

Closed by #19

scott closed this issue

2023-12-24 19:17:46 +00:00

Sign in to join this conversation.